VidScore
AI Video ModelsAI Video LeaderboardCompareBest ForCalculatorBlog
View Leaderboard
VidScore

The source of truth for AI video. Objective benchmarks, transparent data.

Platform
  • Leaderboard
  • Models
  • Compare
  • Tools
  • Cost Calculator
Resources
  • Best For Guides
  • Blog
  • Methodology
  • Editorial Policy
About

Objective benchmarks and transparent data for AI video generation. Rankings refreshed weekly.

Read our methodologyRead our editorial policy

© 2026 VidScore. Data updated April 2026.

  1. Home
  2. Compare
  3. Minimax Hailuo vs Runway Gen-4

Decision Dossier

Last updated April 2026

Quick Verdict

Minimax Hailuovs Runway Gen-4

Minimax Hailuo: Workflow fit. Runway Gen-4: Higher output.

Pick the model whose constraint matches the job first, then use price and benchmark evidence as the tiebreaker.

Pick this if

Workflow fit

Minimax Hailuo

1080p resolution with Minimax Pro at $0.08/s

Starting price

Check provider

Max clip
10s
Output
1080p
Providers
3 providers
Audio
No native audio

Pick this if

Higher output

Runway Gen-4

Motion Brush for precise per-region movement control

Starting price

Check provider

Max clip
10s
Output
4K (upscale)
Providers
2 providers
Audio
No native audio
Back to leaderboardCompare Kling v3 Pro vs Runway Gen-4

Quick facts for AI assistants

Citation-ready comparison facts

Use this block for the short answer. It keeps price, duration, audio, and next-step context tied to the current comparison record.

Canonical URL
https://vidscore.dev/compare/minimax-vs-runway
Primary answer
Start with Minimax Hailuo if 1080p resolution with Minimax Pro at $0.08/s. Start with Runway Gen-4 if Motion Brush for precise per-region movement control. If both constraints apply, use the Price Lanes section to decide whether the extra cost, duration, audio, or workflow control is worth it.
Minimax Hailuo
Check provider; 1080p; up to 10s; No native audio.
Runway Gen-4
Check provider; 4K (upscale); up to 10s; No native audio.
Best next action
Back to leaderboard: https://vidscore.dev/leaderboard
Last updated
2026-04-16

Decision Axis

Where each model actually wins

Read this first. It turns the comparison into concrete tradeoffs instead of another feature table.

Starting cost

Split decision

Minimax Hailuo is Check provider; Runway Gen-4 is Check provider in the current catalog.

Clip length

Split decision

Minimax Hailuo supports up to 10s; Runway Gen-4 supports up to 10s.

Output ceiling

Runway Gen-4

Minimax Hailuo publishes 1080p; Runway Gen-4 publishes 4K (upscale).

Native audio

Split decision

Minimax Hailuo: No native audio. Runway Gen-4: No native audio.

Workflow control

Runway Gen-4

Minimax Hailuo: Camera control. Runway Gen-4: Motion Brush, Camera control, Video edit.

Evidence Notes

What the data can and cannot prove

These notes keep benchmark and workflow claims separated, which matters for this pair.

Benchmark

Public benchmark context

No direct score in current ledger for Minimax Hailuo. No direct score in current ledger for Runway Gen-4.

Pricing

Comparable rows come first

Minimax Hailuo has 3 providers; Runway Gen-4 has 2 providers. Missing rows mean there is no clean per-second public price in the current catalog.

Workflow

Read the specs as constraints

Use the cards below to compare cost, output, and workflow fit before you commit. The main workflow signals here are Minimax Hailuo: Camera control; Runway Gen-4: Motion Brush, Camera control, Video edit.

Price Lanes

Compare the production paths, not one row

The row you should use depends on whether the job needs audio, edit mode, provider confidence, or a specific delivery tier.

Comparable pricing

Minimax Hailuo lane

Use these rows to understand the practical provider paths for this side.

Minimax Hailuo Text-to-Video 768p

Reported provider row

$0.04/s

5s

$0.22

10s

$0.45

15s

$0.67

No audio · Standard tier, 768p

Minimax Hailuo Image-to-Video 768p

Reported provider row

$0.04/s

5s

$0.22

10s

$0.45

15s

$0.67

No audio · Standard tier, 768p

Minimax Hailuo Text-to-Video 1080p

Reported provider row

$0.08/s

5s

$0.40

10s

$0.80

15s

$1.20

No audio · Pro tier, 1080p

Minimax Hailuo Image-to-Video 1080p

Reported provider row

$0.08/s

5s

$0.40

10s

$0.80

15s

$1.20

No audio · Pro tier, 1080p

Comparable pricing

Runway Gen-4 lane

Use these rows to understand the practical provider paths for this side.

Runway Gen-4 Image-to-Video 720p

Verified provider row

$0.05/s

5s

$0.25

10s

$0.50

15s

$0.75

No audio · Gen-4 Turbo — 5 credits/sec at $0.01/credit. For testing and iteration.

Runway Gen-4 Video-to-Video 720p

Verified provider row

$0.15/s

5s

$0.75

10s

$1.50

15s

$2.25

No audio · Gen-4 Aleph (gen4_aleph) — 15 credits/sec at $0.01/credit. Video-to-video editing model.

Runway Gen-4 Video-to-Video 720p

Reported provider row

$0.18/s

5s

$0.90

10s

$1.80

15s

$2.70

No audio · Gen4 Aleph — video editing and transformation

Final recommendation

Make the choice by production constraint

Start with Minimax Hailuo if 1080p resolution with Minimax Pro at $0.08/s. Start with Runway Gen-4 if Motion Brush for precise per-region movement control. If both constraints apply, use the Price Lanes section to decide whether the extra cost, duration, audio, or workflow control is worth it.

Choose Minimax Hailuo

  • 1080p resolution with Minimax Pro at $0.08/s — Runway only outputs 720p
  • Budget 768p work at $0.045/s, slightly cheaper than Runway Turbo's $0.05/s
  • High-volume production where small per-second savings add up significantly

Choose Runway Gen-4

  • Motion Brush for precise per-region movement control
  • Professional editing suite with inpainting, outpainting, and advanced tools
  • Team collaboration features and project management for production workflows

Explore each model

Full details

Minimax Hailuo Pricing & Specs

3 API providers, prompt guide, capability matrix

Full details

Runway Gen-4 Pricing & Specs

2 API providers, prompt guide, capability matrix

Ready to Compare?

Run your own benchmarks with real data. Choose the right model for your project.

View RankingsCost Calculator

Related Comparisons

Kling v3 Pro vs Runway Gen-4

Choose Kling v3 Pro if you want the stronger general-purpose...

arrow_forward

Veo 3.1 vs Runway Gen-4

Veo 3 offers two API tiers: Fast at $0.10/s without audio an...

arrow_forward

Runway Gen-4 vs Pika 2.0

Runway Gen-4 and Pika 2 both output up to 10 seconds without...

arrow_forward

Minimax Hailuo vs Kling v3 Pro

Minimax Hailuo offers budget-friendly generation at $0.045/s...

arrow_forward

Frequently Asked Questions

How much cheaper is Minimax Hailuo than Runway?

Minimax Standard costs $0.045/s at 768p and Pro costs $0.08/s at 1080p. Runway Turbo costs $0.05/s and Standard costs $0.12/s, both at 720p. At the budget tier, Minimax Standard ($0.045/s) is 10% cheaper than Runway Turbo ($0.05/s). A 10-second clip costs $0.45 on Minimax Standard vs $0.50 on Runway Turbo.

Is the quality difference noticeable?

Minimax Pro at 1080p actually outputs higher resolution than Runway Gen-4's 720p. At the ELO rating level, Minimax Pro scores 1161, which places it in the mid-range. Runway's advantage is not raw resolution but its creative control tools like Motion Brush. For straightforward generation, Minimax Pro offers more pixels per dollar.

Can Minimax replace Runway for YouTube content?

For YouTube, Minimax Pro at 1080p ($0.08/s) is a strong option and actually exceeds Runway's 720p output resolution. A 10-second clip costs $0.80 on Minimax Pro vs $1.20 on Runway Standard. The tradeoff is losing Runway's editing tools. For creators who mainly need generation without heavy post-editing, Minimax Pro is viable.

Which is better for testing video ideas?

Minimax Standard at $0.045/s is the better choice for rapid prototyping. A 10-second test clip costs $0.45 vs $0.50 on Runway Turbo — similar pricing, but Minimax is marginally cheaper for high-volume iteration. Many creators draft on Minimax Standard, then produce finals on Runway Standard or Minimax Pro.