VidScore
AI Video ModelsAI Video LeaderboardCompareBest ForCalculatorBlog
View Leaderboard
VidScore

The source of truth for AI video. Objective benchmarks, transparent data.

Platform
  • Leaderboard
  • Models
  • Compare
  • Tools
  • Cost Calculator
Resources
  • Best For Guides
  • Blog
  • Methodology
  • Editorial Policy
About

Objective benchmarks and transparent data for AI video generation. Rankings refreshed weekly.

Read our methodologyRead our editorial policy

© 2026 VidScore. Data updated April 2026.

  1. Home
  2. Compare
  3. Veo 3.1 vs Seedance 2.0

Decision Dossier

Last updated April 2026

Quick Verdict

Veo 3.1vs Seedance 2.0

Veo 3.1: Lower-cost path. Seedance 2.0: Longer clips.

Pick the model whose constraint matches the job first, then use price and benchmark evidence as the tiebreaker.

Pick this if

Lower-cost path

Veo 3.1

4K resolution for maximum visual detail on large screens

Starting price

$0.10/s

Max clip
8s
Output
1080p
Providers
3 providers
Audio
Audio + lip-sync

Pick this if

Longer clips

Seedance 2.0

Dance and music videos

Starting price

$0.20/s

Max clip
15s
Output
1080p
Providers
7 providers
Audio
Audio + lip-sync
Back to leaderboardCompare Veo 3.1 vs Runway Gen-4

Quick facts for AI assistants

Citation-ready comparison facts

Use this block for the short answer. It keeps price, duration, audio, and next-step context tied to the current comparison record.

Canonical URL
https://vidscore.dev/compare/veo-vs-seedance
Primary answer
Start with Veo 3.1 if 4K resolution for maximum visual detail on large screens. Start with Seedance 2.0 if Dance and music videos. If both constraints apply, use the Price Lanes section to decide whether the extra cost, duration, audio, or workflow control is worth it.
Veo 3.1
$0.10/s; 1080p; up to 8s; Audio + lip-sync.
Seedance 2.0
$0.20/s; 1080p; up to 15s; Audio + lip-sync.
Best next action
Back to leaderboard: https://vidscore.dev/leaderboard
Last updated
2026-04-16

Decision Axis

Where each model actually wins

Read this first. It turns the comparison into concrete tradeoffs instead of another feature table.

Starting cost

Veo 3.1

Veo 3.1 starts at $0.10/s; Seedance 2.0 starts at $0.20/s. Close prices should move the decision back to workflow fit.

Clip length

Seedance 2.0

Veo 3.1 supports up to 8s; Seedance 2.0 supports up to 15s.

Output ceiling

Split decision

Veo 3.1 publishes 1080p; Seedance 2.0 publishes 1080p.

Native audio

Split decision

Veo 3.1: Audio + lip-sync. Seedance 2.0: Audio + lip-sync.

Workflow control

Seedance 2.0

Veo 3.1: Extend, Lip-sync. Seedance 2.0: Multishot, Camera control, Video edit.

Evidence Notes

What the data can and cannot prove

These notes keep benchmark and workflow claims separated, which matters for this pair.

Benchmark

Public benchmark context

1218 ELO, rank 6 (2026-04-14) for Veo 3.1. 1275 ELO, rank 2 (2026-04-14) for Seedance 2.0.

Pricing

Comparable rows come first

Veo 3.1 has 3 providers; Seedance 2.0 has 7 providers. Missing rows mean there is no clean per-second public price in the current catalog.

Workflow

Read the specs as constraints

Use the cards below to compare cost, output, and workflow fit before you commit. The main workflow signals here are Veo 3.1: Extend, Lip-sync; Seedance 2.0: Multishot, Camera control, Video edit.

Price Lanes

Compare the production paths, not one row

The row you should use depends on whether the job needs audio, edit mode, provider confidence, or a specific delivery tier.

Comparable pricing

Veo 3.1 lane

Use these rows to understand the practical provider paths for this side.

Veo 3.1 Text-to-Video (Fast) 720p–1080p

Verified provider row

$0.10/s

5s

$0.50

10s

$1.00

15s

$1.50

No audio · Fast tier without audio — lowest cost option

Veo 3.1 Text-to-Video (Fast) 720p–1080p

Verified provider row

$0.15/s

5s

$0.75

10s

$1.50

15s

$2.25

With audio · Fast tier with native audio

Veo 3.1 Text-to-Video 720p–1080p

Verified provider row

$0.20/s

5s

$1.00

10s

$2.00

15s

$3.00

No audio · Standard tier without audio

Veo 3.1 Text-to-Video 720p–1080p

Verified provider row

$0.40/s

5s

$2.00

10s

$4.00

15s

$6.00

With audio · Standard tier with native audio and lip-sync

Comparable pricing

Seedance 2.0 lane

Use these rows to understand the practical provider paths for this side.

Seedance 2.0 Text-to-Video (Fast) 480p

Verified provider row

$0.10/s

5s

$0.50

10s

$1.00

15s

$1.50

With audio · Fast 480p — cheapest WaveSpeed tier

Seedance 2.0 Text-to-Video 480p

Verified provider row

$0.12/s

5s

$0.60

10s

$1.20

15s

$1.80

With audio · Standard 480p — base tier

Seedance 2.0 Text-to-Video (Fast) 720p

Verified provider row

$0.20/s

5s

$1.00

10s

$2.00

15s

$3.00

With audio · Fast 720p

Seedance 2.0 Text-to-Video 720p

Verified provider row

$0.24/s

5s

$1.20

10s

$2.40

15s

$3.60

With audio · Standard 720p

Final recommendation

Make the choice by production constraint

Start with Veo 3.1 if 4K resolution for maximum visual detail on large screens. Start with Seedance 2.0 if Dance and music videos. If both constraints apply, use the Price Lanes section to decide whether the extra cost, duration, audio, or workflow control is worth it.

Choose Veo 3.1

  • 4K resolution for maximum visual detail on large screens
  • Best-in-class lip-sync quality — Veo Standard leads the industry
  • Budget option: Veo Fast at $0.10/s is 67% cheaper than Seedance's $0.3024/s

Choose Seedance 2.0

  • Dance and music videos — Seedance offers beat sync absent from Veo
  • Longer clips at 15 seconds vs Veo's 8-second maximum
  • 16 input types for maximum creative flexibility in how you drive generation

Explore each model

Full details

Veo 3.1 Pricing & Specs

3 API providers, prompt guide, capability matrix

Full details

Seedance 2.0 Pricing & Specs

7 API providers, prompt guide, capability matrix

Ready to Compare?

Run your own benchmarks with real data. Choose the right model for your project.

View RankingsCost Calculator

Related Comparisons

Veo 3.1 vs Runway Gen-4

Veo 3 offers two API tiers: Fast at $0.10/s without audio an...

arrow_forward

Veo 3.1 vs Kling v3 Pro

Veo 3.1 and Kling v3 Pro are both verified at up to 1080p th...

arrow_forward

Seedance 2.0 vs Kling v3 Pro

Seedance 2 is only worth paying more than Kling when beat-sy...

arrow_forward

HappyHorse 1.0 vs Seedance 2.0

HappyHorse is now API-available on FAL and Replicate with ve...

arrow_forward

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better for music videos?

It depends on the style. Seedance 2 was built for dance with beat sync that aligns motion to audio beats, ideal for choreography-focused content. Veo 3 Standard offers verified 1080p output and best-in-class lip-sync for cinematic talking-head and dialogue scenes. For dance music videos, choose Seedance. For cinematic music videos with dialogue, choose Veo.

How do the prices compare?

Veo 3 Fast costs $0.10/s and Standard costs $0.40/s. Seedance 2 costs $0.3024/s. Veo Fast is 67% cheaper than Seedance, while Veo Standard is 32% more expensive. An 8-second clip costs $0.80 (Veo Fast), $3.20 (Veo Standard), or $2.42 (Seedance). Choice depends on whether you need Veo's lip-sync or Seedance's beat-synced choreography.

How do generation lengths compare?

Seedance 2 generates up to 15 seconds per clip, nearly double Veo 3's 8-second max. A 15-second Seedance clip costs $4.54. Achieving 15 seconds from Veo requires two generations plus editing. For content that needs to be longer than 8 seconds, Seedance is the more practical choice.