VidScore
AI Video ModelsAI Video LeaderboardCompareBest ForCalculatorBlog
View Leaderboard
VidScore

The source of truth for AI video. Objective benchmarks, transparent data.

Platform
  • Leaderboard
  • Models
  • Compare
  • Tools
  • Cost Calculator
Resources
  • Best For Guides
  • Blog
  • Methodology
  • Editorial Policy
About

Objective benchmarks and transparent data for AI video generation. Rankings refreshed weekly.

Read our methodologyRead our editorial policy

© 2026 VidScore. Data updated April 2026.

  1. Home
  2. Blog
  3. Best Open Source AI Video Generators (2026)
Best Open Source AI Video Generators (2026)
feature deep dive8 min read

Best Open Source AI Video Generators (2026)

Open-source AI video models compared: verified self-hostable picks, HappyHorse API-available but not self-hostable status, FramePack 6GB VRAM setup, and self-hosting vs API costs.

By VidScore Team|Updated April 29, 2026

Summary: 8 open-source AI video models compared as of April 29, 2026. HappyHorse 1.0 is API-available, but not a verified self-hostable release yet. Best API value: LTX-2 Pro at $0.06/sec with 1080p + audio + lip-sync (LTX-2 Community License). Cheapest API: HunyuanVideo 1.5 at $0.02/sec on WaveSpeed. Best for consumer GPUs: FramePack runs on 6GB VRAM (RTX 3060, ~$300). Self-hosting breaks even at ~200 clips/month for some open-weight workflows. The quality gap has narrowed, but not every announced open-weight model is production-usable yet.

Open-source AI video has become strong enough for real production workflows, but the most important detail is whether a model is actually usable today. HappyHorse 1.0 is a high-interest API-available model, but we cannot verify public weights or self-hosting rights yet; see the HappyHorse availability tracker. Of the 28 model records we track, several are verified open-weight options, and the cheapest costs just $0.02/sec via API.

We compared every open-source AI video model on license terms, hardware requirements, API pricing, and self-hosting viability. Whether you want the cheapest API option or full control by running models on your own GPUs, this guide covers the complete landscape.

Prices verified: April 29, 2026.

All Open-Source AI Video Models

ModelLicenseParametersVRAM NeededAPI Price ($/sec)Self-Host Viable?
HappyHorse 1.0API verified; not self-hostable15BNo public weights verifiedNo API yetNo
Wan 2.7Hosted/API; open release not verified27B (MoE)No public weights verified$0.10No
LTX-2 ProLTX-2 Community14B24–48GB$0.06Yes (A5000/A6000+)
HunyuanVideo 1.5Open (Tencent)8.3B14GB$0.02 (WaveSpeed)Yes (RTX 4090)
FramePackOpen—6GB$0.033Yes (RTX 3060)
Mochi 1Apache 2.010B24GB$0.40/clipYes (A5000+)
CogVideoX-5BCustom (commercial OK)5B16GB$0.20/clipYes (RTX 4090)
SkyReels V4Closed/API until V4 release verifiedNot publicNo public V4 weights verified$0.12No

Model Deep Dives

HappyHorse 1.0 — API-Available, Not Open Source

HappyHorse 1.0 is a high-interest model because public reporting attributes strong benchmark performance and multilingual lip-sync to it. But availability matters more than launch claims: FAL and Replicate now verify provider API access and generation pricing, but we cannot currently verify downloadable weights, inference code, license terms, or a mature public repo.

The practical guidance is simple: test HappyHorse through provider APIs if you want to compare quality, but do not count it as a production self-hosting option until public weights, license terms, and runnable inference are verified. We track those checks in the HappyHorse availability page.

Wan 2.7 — Hosted API and Open-Weight Watchlist

Wan 2.7 from Alibaba is a hosted/API model in this catalog, not a verified self-hostable release. At 27B parameters using a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture, it supports four generation modes: text-to-video, image-to-video, video-to-video, and audio-driven generation. API pricing starts at $0.10/sec on FAL.ai. Until public weights, inference code, and license terms are verified, keep Wan 2.7 in the open-weight watchlist bucket rather than the self-hostable bucket.

LTX-2 Pro — Best Balance of Quality, Price, and Features

LTX-2 Pro is the open-source model we recommend most often. At $0.06/secwith audio included, it’s the cheapest 1080p+audio option on the market. It uses the LTX-2 Community License, has 14B parameters, supports native 4K ($0.24/sec at 4K on the verified FAL endpoint), and includes lip-sync capability. Its 50fps output is smooth enough for slow-motion content.

HunyuanVideo 1.5 — Cheapest API Option

HunyuanVideo 1.5 from Tencent is the absolute cheapest AI video model via API at $0.02/sec on WaveSpeed. At 8.3B parameters and 14GB VRAM, it’s also one of the most accessible for self-hosting. The trade-off is that current provider docs keep the default generation range around 480p-720p, with 1080p treated as super-resolution/upscale, and no native audio. Best for high-volume generation where quality is secondary to cost.

FramePack — Best for Consumer Hardware

FramePack is the standout for self-hosting on consumer GPUs. It runs on just 6GB VRAM (an RTX 3060 at ~$300) and its local project documents 60-second / 1,800-frame generation at 30fps. The hosted FAL endpoint is narrower: image-to-video, 480p/720p tiers, and a 180-frame cap per generation. There is no native audio. The API price on FAL.ai starts at $0.033/sec, but self-hosting on a consumer GPU eliminates per-second costs entirely.

Mochi 1 — Apache 2.0 Pioneer

Mochi 1 from Genmo was one of the first high-quality open-source video models. At 10B parameters with an Apache 2.0 license, it produces 480p output. API pricing is $0.40 per clip (flat rate). Mochi 1 laid the groundwork for the open-source video generation ecosystem, though newer models like LTX-2 Pro and Wan 2.7 have surpassed it on quality.

CogVideoX-5B — Lightweight Option

CogVideoX-5B is the smallest model in this comparison at 5B parameters. Its custom license permits commercial use. At 16GB VRAM, it runs on an RTX 4090 or equivalent. Output is 480p with API pricing at $0.20 per clip. Best suited as a starting point for teams exploring self-hosted video generation with limited GPU resources.

SkyReels V4 — Hosted/API Until V4 Release Is Verified

SkyReels V4 from Skywork AI is a strong multimodal video candidate with reported API access at $0.12/sec with audio included, but we do not verify public V4 weights, runnable inference code, or license terms yet. Treat it as hosted/API coverage, not a self-hosting recommendation, until those release artifacts are public.

Self-Host Economics: When to Run Your Own GPU

Self-hosting eliminates per-second API costs but introduces fixed infrastructure costs. Here’s when it makes financial sense.

SetupHardware CostModels SupportedAPI EquivalentBreakeven
Consumer: RTX 3060~$300 (one-time)FramePack$0.033/sec (FAL.ai)~180 clips (5s each)
Consumer: RTX 4090~$1,600 (one-time)FramePack, HunyuanVideo 1.5, CogVideoX$0.02–$0.033/sec~300–500 clips
Pro: A5000/A6000~$4,000 (one-time)All above + LTX-2 Pro, Mochi 1$0.06/sec (LTX-2 Pro)~250 clips at LTX-2 Pro rates
Cloud: H100 rental~$2/hrLarge verified open-weight modelsVaries by model and utilization~200 clips/month

Breakeven estimates assume 5-second clips with generation overhead. Actual numbers depend on generation speed and GPU utilization.

Decision Framework

  • Under 200 clips/month: Use API pricing. Zero infrastructure overhead means the per-second cost is absorbed by operational simplicity.
  • 200–500 clips/month:Self-hosting on a consumer GPU (RTX 3060 for FramePack, RTX 4090 for HunyuanVideo) breaks even. One-time hardware cost pays for itself within 1–3 months.
  • 500+ clips/month:Dedicated pro GPU (A5000/A6000) or cloud H100 rental becomes strongly cost-effective. Running LTX-2 Pro on an A6000 saves $0.06/sec on every clip — at 500 clips that’s $150/month in API savings.
  • Enterprise scale: Cloud H100 rental at ~$2/hr supports large verified open-weight models. At continuous utilization, this can be cheaper than API pricing for high-quality models, but it only applies to models with public weights and runnable inference code.

Open Source vs Commercial: Quality Comparison

MetricBest Open SourceBest CommercialGap
API-available / not self-hostableHappyHorse 1.0 (not self-hostable yet)SkyReels V4Verify availability first
Cheapest APIHunyuanVideo 1.5 ($0.02/sec)Pika 2.0 ($0.04/sec)Open source 2x cheaper
Cheapest 1080p + audioLTX-2 Pro ($0.06/sec)Hailuo 02 Pro ($0.08, no audio)Open source wins on features
Verified native 4K APILTX-2 Pro ($0.24/sec)No lower-cost verified API pathOpen source is the verified 4K API path
Best verified lip-syncLTX-2 ProVeo 3.1 ($0.40/sec)Comparable quality
Self-host (consumer GPU)FramePack (6GB VRAM)N/AOpen source exclusive

Key Insight: The Quality Gap Has Closed

The narrative that commercial AI video models are fundamentally better than open-source alternatives is no longer true. Verified open-weight models now cover real workflows, and FramePack proves you can generate AI video on a $300 consumer GPU. But API-available non-open models like HappyHorse 1.0 and hosted watchlist models like Wan 2.7 should stay out of the open-source bucket until their public weights and license terms are verified; start with the HappyHorse availability tracker before treating it as an open-source option.

What commercial models still offer is convenience and features: Kling v3’s multi-shot generation, Veo 3.1’s premium lip-sync, and Runway Gen-4.5’s cinematic aesthetics are not yet matched by open-source alternatives. But for raw quality-per-dollar, open source leads.

For complete API pricing across all models, see our AI Video Pricing Guide, or compare providers with our API Provider Guide.

FAQ

What is the best open-source AI video model in 2026?

For self-hosting today, start with FramePack for low-VRAM image-to-video, HunyuanVideo for open text/image-to-video, or LTX-2 Pro for higher-end workflows. HappyHorse 1.0 is now API-available on FAL and Replicate with verified generation pricing, but as of April 29, 2026 we still cannot verify downloadable weights, inference code, license terms, or a mature public repo, so it should not be treated as an open-source release.

Can I self-host AI video models on consumer GPUs?

Yes. FramePack runs on as little as 6GB VRAM (RTX 3060, ~$300 one-time cost) and its local project documents 60-second / 1,800-frame generation. HunyuanVideo 1.5 requires 14GB VRAM and is primarily 480p-720p in current provider docs, with 1080p handled as super-resolution/upscale rather than the default render tier. Wan 2.7 is available through hosted APIs, but we do not currently verify downloadable Wan 2.7 weights for self-hosting.

Is it cheaper to self-host or use an API for AI video?

At approximately 200-500 clips per month, self-hosting becomes cheaper than API pricing. FramePack on an RTX 3060 costs ~$300 one-time vs $0.033/sec on FAL.ai. HunyuanVideo 1.5 on a rented H100 costs ~$2/hr vs $0.02/sec on WaveSpeed. Below 200 clips/month, API pricing is more cost-effective due to zero infrastructure overhead.

Has open-source AI video caught up with commercial models?

The gap has narrowed, but the claim needs precision. Several verified open-weight models are now viable for real workflows, especially FramePack, HunyuanVideo, and LTX-2 Pro. HappyHorse 1.0 and Wan 2.7 are watchlist items for open-weight/self-hosting coverage; do not count them as verified downloadable open-source releases until weights, code, and license terms are public.

Sources

  • VidScore HappyHorse availability tracker — API is now verified; public weights and self-hosting status are not verified
  • Wan 2.7 on FAL.ai — Hosted API pricing; open-weight release not verified
  • LTX-2 Pro on FAL.ai — LTX-2 Community License, 14B params, 4K output
  • HunyuanVideo on GitHub — Tencent Hunyuan Community License, 8.3B params
  • FramePack on GitHub — 6GB VRAM, documented 60s local generation
  • Mochi 1 on GitHub — Apache 2.0, 10B params from Genmo
  • Artificial Analysis Video Arena — Current ELO rankings; verify model availability separately
  • WaveSpeed AI — Cheapest API hosting for open-source models
Continue Reading

Related reading

feature deep dive

Where to Try HappyHorse 1.0: FAL API, Replicate, Alibaba Cloud, Pricing and Weights Status

HappyHorse 1.0 is now available through FAL and Replicate APIs. Track verified endpoint IDs, $0.14/s and $0.28/s pricing, Alibaba Cloud docs, weights, and wrapper claims.

feature deep dive

Fastest AI Video Generator 2026: All 28 Model Records Speed-Ranked

Grok generates AI video in ~17s; HappyHorse is a newly API-available speed-quality outlier with verified generation pricing. All 28 model records speed-ranked with per-second pricing, quality tiers, and API latency.

market report

State of AI Video — April 2026

April 2026 market report: HappyHorse is now API-available but not self-hostable, Sora app/web ended April 26, Veo lowers costs, and open weights matter.

Explore the cluster

Related models

Wan 2.1
Alibaba
FramePack
HuggingFace Community (lllyasviel)
Mochi 1
Genmo

Compare next

HappyHorse 1.0 vs Seedance 2.0

HappyHorse is now API-available on FAL and Replicate with verified generation pricing, but public weights, self-hosting, and long-run production behavior are still not verified. Seedance 2 remains the more established production choice when you need broader workflow history, while HappyHorse is worth testing directly for native-audio quality and current arena momentum.

HappyHorse 1.0 vs Kling v3 Pro

HappyHorse is now API-available on FAL and Replicate with verified generation pricing, strong native-audio positioning, and current benchmark momentum, but public weights, self-hosting, and long-run provider behavior are still not verified. Kling v3 Pro remains the safer production choice when camera control, multi-shot structure, mature provider history, and lower operational uncertainty matter more than testing the newest model.

Wan 2.7 vs Kling v3 Pro

Wan 2.7 is a hosted/API model at $0.10/s with 1080p output, 15-second max, native audio, and 4 generation modes. Kling v3 Pro is a commercial model at $0.112/s with verified 1080p output, 15-second max, optional audio, and 6-shot multishot. Pricing is nearly identical; Kling offers stronger multishot/story controls, while Wan provides a broader hosted mode set. We do not verify Wan 2.7 as open-source or self-hostable yet.

Use cases

Cheapest AI Video Generators (2026)

Compare the cheapest AI video generators in 2026 by real API cost per second. PixVerse v6 leads at $0.025/sec, followed by Pika 2 at $0.04/sec and Kling 2.5 Turbo at $0.042/sec.

Fastest AI Video Generators (2026)

Compare the fastest AI video generators in 2026 by generation speed and cost. Kling 2.5 Turbo and Pika 2 lead on turnaround, with PixVerse v6 offering the best speed-value ratio.

Best AI Video Generator for TikTok (2026)

Best AI video generator for TikTok in 2026: use Kling v3 Pro for quality, Kling 2.5 Turbo for budget, and PixVerse v6 for the fastest low-cost workflow with optional audio.